Nike has suddenly become something few investors ever expected it to be: A high-yield dividend stock. With NKE trading around $36, Nike's $0.41 quarterly dividend translates into an annualized payout of $1.64 and a yield of roughly 4.6% . Nike formally declared its latest $0.41 quarterly dividend on August 6. That puts the yield in territory normally associated with utilities, banks and mature consumer staples—not one of the world's most recognizable athletic brands. It is tempting to look at that 4.6% yield and see opportunity. I see something more complicated. Nike's dividend yield hasn't surged because management suddenly became extraordinarily generous. The yield surged because the stock collapsed. And when a dividend yield rises because the denominator is falling rather than because the numerator is rapidly growing, investors need to ask a much more important question: Can the business comfortably afford the dividend? For Nike, the latest numbers provide reasons fo...
The most important investment decision of the next decade might not be which stocks investors own. It might be how much of each stock they own . That's the fascinating argument emerging from new Bank of America valuation work comparing the traditional capitalization-weighted S&P 500 with its equal-weight counterpart. The conclusion is striking. Bank of America's normalized valuation model puts the traditional S&P 500 at approximately 32 times normalized earnings , a level historically associated with roughly negative 3% average annual returns over the following decade . The S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, meanwhile, trades at approximately 25 times normalized earnings , which the same framework associates with roughly positive 3% annualized returns . That's a six-percentage-point difference in projected annual performance. Compounded over ten years, the implications become enormous. And investors don't need to abandon the S&P 500 to make the switch. They sim...